20260422:更新

This commit is contained in:
2026-04-22 16:56:53 +08:00
parent dd8345a6ea
commit 0b1535dfaf
34 changed files with 4111 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
# Spurious Predictability in Financial Machine Learning
**Authors:** Sotirios D. Nikolopoulos
**arXiv ID:** 2604.15531v1
**Published:** 2026-04-16
**Categories:** q-fin.ST, stat.ME, stat.ML
**Comments:** 49 pages, 10 figures. The QuantAudit R package and full replication scripts will be made publicly available upon journal publication
**Subjects:** Statistical Finance (q-fin.ST); Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
**MSC classes:** 91G70, 62P20, 62M20, 68T05
**DOI:** https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.15531
## Abstract
Adaptive specification search generates statistically significant backtests even under martingale-difference nulls. We introduce a falsification audit testing complete predictive workflows against synthetic reference classes, including zero-predictability environments and microstructure placebos. Workflows generating significant walk-forward evidence in these environments are falsified. For passing workflows, we quantify selection-induced performance inflation using an absolute magnitude gap linking optimized in-sample evidence to disjoint walk-forward realizations, adjusted for effective multiplicity. Simulations validate extreme-value scaling under correlated searches and demonstrate detection power under genuine structure. Empirical case studies confirm that many apparent findings represent methodological artifacts rather than genuine predictability.
## Key Concepts
### 1. Spurious Predictability
The phenomenon where adaptive specification search (data mining, model selection, hyperparameter tuning) can generate statistically significant backtest results even when the underlying data-generating process has no genuine predictive structure (martingale-difference nulls).
### 2. Falsification Audit
A methodological framework for testing complete predictive workflows against synthetic reference classes:
- **Zero-predictability environments**: Simulated data with no genuine predictive structure
- **Microstructure placebos**: Realistic but non-predictive market microstructure features
### 3. Selection-Induced Performance Inflation
The bias introduced by model selection and optimization, quantified as the gap between:
- Optimized in-sample performance
- Out-of-sample (walk-forward) performance on disjoint data
### 4. Effective Multiplicity
Adjustment for the multiple comparisons problem in adaptive specification search, accounting for correlated search paths and dependencies between model specifications.
## Methodology
### Falsification Framework
1. **Reference class construction**: Create synthetic environments with known properties
2. **Workflow testing**: Apply the complete predictive workflow to reference classes
3. **Falsification criteria**: Reject workflows that show significant predictive power in zero-predictability environments
### Performance Gap Quantification
For workflows that pass falsification tests:
1. **In-sample optimization**: Measure performance on training data
2. **Walk-forward validation**: Test on disjoint out-of-sample periods
3. **Gap calculation**: Compute absolute magnitude difference adjusted for effective multiplicity
## Empirical Findings
### Case Studies
The paper presents empirical case studies demonstrating that many apparent findings in financial machine learning represent methodological artifacts rather than genuine predictability.
### Implications
1. **Methodological rigor**: Need for robust validation frameworks
2. **Publication bias**: Tendency to publish positive results without proper falsification
3. **Replication crisis**: Similar challenges as in other empirical sciences
## Technical Contributions
### 1. QuantAudit R Package
The authors will release an R package implementing the falsification audit framework.
### 2. Statistical Framework
- Extreme-value theory for correlated searches
- Effective multiplicity adjustments
- Walk-forward validation protocols
### 3. Simulation Studies
Validation of the framework's detection power under various data-generating processes.
## Related Concepts
- [[cramer-rao-lower-bound]] - Theoretical bounds on parameter estimation
- [[computerized-adaptive-testing]] - Adaptive testing methodologies
- [[symbolic-regression]] - Machine learning for discovering mathematical expressions
- [[formal-verification]] - Formal methods for validation
## References
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15531
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.15531
- HTML: https://arxiv.org/html/2604.15531v1
## BibTeX
```bibtex
@article{nikolopoulos2026spurious,
title={Spurious Predictability in Financial Machine Learning},
author={Nikolopoulos, Sotirios D.},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.15531},
year={2026}
}
```