Files
myWiki/concepts/rubric-based-evaluation.md

42 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
title: "量规评估Rubric-Based Evaluation"
created: 2026-07-02
updated: 2026-07-02
type: concept
tags: [evaluation, rubric, judge, frontend]
sources:
- "[[verification-horizon-no-silver-bullet]]"
---
# 量规评估Rubric-Based Evaluation
将整体评估分解为细粒度评分维度的结构化评估方法,减少 model-based judge 的主观偏差和不一致性。
## 论文中的设计
Qwen Team 的前端评估 rubric 将评估分解为 6 个维度,平均每任务 25.9 个 checklist 条目:
| 维度 | 占比 |
|------|:---:|
| Functional功能正确性 | 37.7% |
| Content内容完整性 | 19.0% |
| Visual视觉质量 | 13.3% |
| Layout布局 | 12.9% |
| UX用户体验 | 9.3% |
| Technical技术质量 | 7.2% |
## 效果验证
- **Judge-Model 排名一致性**:跨 scorer 家族 Kendall τ ≥ 0.93
- **Prompt 变体鲁棒**:改变 strictness、thinking level 不改变排名
- **人机对齐**Spearman ρ = 0.81-0.91
## 局限
静态评估无法覆盖需要运行时行为的场景(表单验证、动态路由、多页导航),这推动了 [[interactive-judge|交互式判断器]] 的发展。
## 参考
- [[verification-horizon-no-silver-bullet|论文原文]]
- [[interactive-judge|交互式判断器]]