Pre-train Space Reinforcement Learning: From P(y|x) to P(y)
2604.14142
Yuqiao Tan
Minzheng Wang
Bo Liu
Zichen Liu
Tian Liang
Shizhu He
Jun Zhao
Kang Liu
arXiv preprint
2026-04-15
paper
reinforcement-learning
pre-training
LLM
reasoning
GRPO
Pre-train Space Reinforcement Learning
arXiv: 2604.14142Authors: Yuqiao Tan¹²*, Minzheng Wang¹²*, Bo Liu³, Zichen Liu³, Tian Liang⁴, Shizhu He¹²†, Jun Zhao¹², Kang Liu¹²
Affiliations: ¹ CASIA, ² UCAS, ³ NUS, ⁴ Tencent AI Lab
Equal contribution, † Corresponding author
Abstract
While reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) significantly enhances LLM reasoning by optimizing the conditional distribution P(y|x), its potential is fundamentally bounded by the base model's existing output distribution. Optimizing the marginal distribution P(y) in the Pre-train Space addresses this bottleneck by encoding reasoning ability and preserving broad exploration capacity. Yet, conventional pre-training relies on static corpora for passive learning, leading to a distribution shift that hinders targeted reasoning enhancement. In this paper, we introduce PreRL (Pre-train Space RL), which applies reward-driven online updates directly to P(y). We theoretically and empirically validate the strong gradient alignment between log P(y) and log P(y|x), establishing PreRL as a viable surrogate for standard RL. Furthermore, we uncover a critical mechanism: Negative Sample Reinforcement (NSR) within PreRL serves as an exceptionally effective driver for reasoning. NSR-PreRL rapidly prunes incorrect reasoning spaces while stimulating endogenous reflective behaviors, increasing transition and reflection thoughts by 14.89× and 6.54×, respectively. Leveraging these insights, we propose Dual Space RL (DSRL), a Policy Reincarnation strategy that initializes models with NSR-PreRL to expand the reasoning horizon before transitioning to standard RL for fine-grained optimization.
Key Claims
Gradient Alignment: <∇log P(y), ∇log P(y|x)> ≥ 0 for all samples (empirically validated), confirming PreRL as a viable surrogate for standard RL
NSR > PSR in Pre-train Space: Negative Sample Reinforcement (suppressing incorrect paths) is far more effective than Positive Sample Reinforcement in the pre-train space
DSRL outperforms GRPO: Dual Space RL achieves +2-5 point improvement on benchmarks like AIME24/25, with 1.6×-2.5× sample efficiency
NSR-PreRL stimulates endogenous reasoning: 14.89× more transition thoughts, 6.54× more reflection thoughts